Read this, and then read this.
Amazing.
So now childless people are the resource leeches because they won't produce more children to keep society going?
Funny how the authors and many of their commenters ignore the level of their leechitude RIGHT NOW as our tax dollars go to subsidize their children. Because Children Are The Future, I guess their leeching is supposed to be OK.
You want to keep the world going? You pay for it. I really don't care. I didn't ask to be born, I'm paying my bills, my taxes, and my way while I'm here, my life insurance will pay to dispose of my corpse, and once I'm dead, none of this is my problem any more.
I owe you breeders two things: Jack and Shit.
Oh, by the way, if you have children and they don't live to adulthood, or end up in jail, or disabled, or in an institution, or otherwise can't work and pay taxes and contribute to society, perhaps you should not only face the same penalties you suggest for the childless, but also an extra penalty because you put additional people on this earth who drain money and resources rather than contribute.
Bet you morons didn't think about THAT, did you? Or do you assume that all children somehow contribute to society, even if they're drooling or tarding or raping or murdering or talking to themselves in an alley or masturbating in a jail cell or collecting welfare?
Do you have to be stupid to be a parent, or does parenting make people stupid? I know parents who are actually smart and wouldn't believe the shit perpetuated by the dolts who wrote the linked articles, so I hope these two are special (education) cases.
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Who are the real freeloaders here?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
well theres a similar posting over on free republic
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1590865/posts?q=1&&page=1#1
my response and my fiances is this
if a persons worth is due to them having or adopting a kid, wouldn't that bring into play an abusive situation, they adopt this kid, but they don't care about it, all they want is the personal power in having a kid. worse case you would have people adopting kids, then neglecting and abusing and killing them for their own personal power. does this self worth of having kids end at some point, could say you have a kid till its 5, and then adopt it out, or it dies, or is murdered by the parents, do they still have more worth than a childless/childfree person. you will get people adopting just to get SS or to vote, and wont actually care about the kids. so abuse and neglect, and more screwed up humans, ad infinitum
I went to the link you posted... I noticed the owner of the blog turned off ALL comments concerning his childfree rants.
It's very telling, because the poster probably could not come up with a rebuttal to the accurate criticisms from the childfree community.
Obviously, he can dish it but he cannot take it.
The most hilarious comment made by the poster is that children are "legacies." How funny. I'm sorry, but most people are not remembered by the number of children they breeded, no matter what their social status.
My parents didn't have three children because they wanted a "legacy." How stupid.
yes i think i hit them 3 times and a friend from my forum hit them as well. and i think we made some points that he couldnt argue with ;-)
Some of you “childfree” people might be thinking that I have closed down the old post for comments because I couldn’t stomach your scathing and erudite criticisms. To the contrary.
Uh-huh. Have your testes peeked out from under your beer gut yet?
You people mistake your prediliction for controlling others
Projection, party of one?
with my suggestion that with freedom comes responsibility.
You mean, the freedom to breed comes with responsibility to actually RAISE YOUR FUCKING KID DECENTLY? Yeah, I'll drink to that, but somehow I don't think that's what you meant.
I, and many others of both genders, am not going to give up a belief that being a housewife is a good role for women and that it is preferable that most women should try to be as much of a fulltime mother as they possibly can.
"Eat shit...10 billion flies can't be wrong!"
You might as well stop now if you’re going to try to convince me that it’s perfectly fine for a woman to demand that a man give up his sports car, nights with the guys, video games and beer for a minivan, a regular schedule that focuses almost exclusively on his family and little for himself all the while she gets to have a career for her own fullfillment when she probably doesn’t need it.
But of course, it's fine — nay, noble! — for her to deny herself fulfillment and care for the crotchnuggets while he goes out with the guys and so forth, because $DEITY ordained us Womben to put everyone else before ourselves.
But the sad little fact of life is that women by and large, even most “enlightened” feminists do not respect men who stay at or near home rather than focus on the office.
And it's our fault that you've dated and even married the wrong women all your life, chucklenuts? Reminds me of all the guys who won't date a woman unless she looks like she pole-dances for money, then whine about how "all women are gold diggers." Yeah, because bimbos spend hours a day on their appearance and deny themselves the comfort of tasty food just to please you, without expecting some sort of economic reward.
Just don’t start on that “I’m subsidizing your little shit” routine, unless you’re willing to forego that “little shit” being obligated to pay for your Social Security, Medicare or any other benefits, including a government pension.
WHAT government pension?! And, for that matter, what Social Security?! I'm 38. None of those goodies are going to be around when I hit 65...or, more likely, 75, since they keep raising the age higher and higher. Sorry, but of all the breeder bingos out there, "Gotta pop out more baybeez for our national Ponzi scheme!" has to be one of the stupidest.
You’ve been a great and merry band of trolls, but the amusement has worn out now.
Translation: "I'm still smarting that y'all didn't worship my functional dick, and in fact you've dashed the plans I had tonight to once again impregnate my submissive and Gawdly helpmeet."
...I am not arguing for forcing women to do anything in regard to starting a family, save for my opposition to abortion, which is based first and foremost in logic, not religion.
Eh-heh! You're about acquainted with logic as Britney Spears is with semiconductor research.
So as you have no doubt guessed by now, the comments and trackbacks on these posts are closed now.
Which you've said about five times now, cumstain. Unlike you, most CF are capable of taking a point without it being pounded into their heads. By now, shouldn't you be, like, off watching your L'il Myrakullz shit rainbows?
I work in a place that's seen as a reasonably tolerant place. And yet, the unquestioned traditional attitudes that abound here make me sick.
All the men have insecurity issues and are married to women who don't work. Basically, these women are whores who jsut wanted to find some nice, stable john, drop a kid or two with him, and use that as an excuse to never go and work like a real independent grownup. She just wanted a meal ticket.
You tell me that's not whoring? OK, instead of just selling her vagina, she's selling the function of her uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes, too. But basically, why is he paying her bills and not his jobless cousin Moe's bills, the guy who is probably homeless? B.c. he's fucking her, that's why. So she's paid to fuck and breed. That's a whore if I ever heard of one.
And he's a disgusting insecure john who can't deal with someone who might be independent. If you want unconditional love, no questioning, and no thinking, get a fucking goldfish, or a severely retarded dog. He doesn't believe that someone who's smart and has her own salary would want to be with him. But this is a self-fulfilling prophecy-- knowing that he's behaved himself in this way, what smart woman would want him? Plus, he's got some nagging fear that after all's said and done, if he were to drop dead tomorrow, nothing in the world would change (and if anything wereto change, it might be for the better) because he's never accomplished anything.
So of course, at some point, his fear of being a total useless nothing gets to him, and he subscribes to some silly religion that tells him that no matter how lame and stupid he might be, GOD HAS A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR HIM, and now he can assuage his uselessness. And then, of course,his kids are his 'heirs' so he can pass on the stupid.
These 30-40something men are really resentful of working women (mothers or childfree women). They know their fathers (who are now in their 60-70s) had it good-- talented women were barred from the workplace, so less competition for the good jobs.
Let's face it, there are only so many $100,000/yr or more type jobs out there and men don't want to compete against more people for these jobs. So they subscribe to the anti-choice, anti-birth control agenda so that women can be bogged down with brats they don't want and be too busy, poor, and psychologically damaged to compete with them for the power and the jobs.
Post a Comment